4.6 Article

Improved grading and survival prediction of human astrocytic brain tumors by artificial neural network analysis of gene expression microarray data

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 1013-1024

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0177

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cancer Research UK [A6618] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histopathologic grading of astrocytic tumors based on current WHO criteria offers a valuable but simplified representation of oncologic reality and is often insufficient to predict clinical outcome. In this study, we report a new astrocytic tumor microarray gene expression data set (n = 65). We have used a simple artificial neural network algorithm to address grading of human astrocytic tumors, derive specific transcriptional signatures from histopathologic subtypes of astrocytic tumors, and asses whether these molecular signatures define survival prognostic subclasses, Fifty-nine classifier genes were identified and found to fall within three distinct functional classes, that is, angiogenesis, cell differentiation, and lower-grade astrocytic tumor discrimination. These gene classes were found to characterize three molecular tumor subtypes denoted ANGIO, INTER, and LOWER. Grading of samples using these subtypes agreed with prior histopathologic grading for both our data set (96.15%) and an independent data set. Six tumors were particularly challenging to diagnose histopathologically. We present an artificial neural network grading for these samples and offer an evidence-based interpretation of grading results using clinical metadata to substantiate findings. The prognostic value of the three identified tumor subtypes was found to outperform histopathologic grading as well as tumor subtypes reported in other studies, indicating a high survival prognostic potential for the 59 gene classifiers. Finally, 11 gene classifiers that differentiate between primary and secondary glioblastomas were also identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据