4.6 Article

A rationally designed tyrosine hydroxylase DNA vaccine induces specific antineuroblastoma immunity

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 7, 期 7, 页码 2241-2251

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0109

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapeutic vaccination against tumor antigens without induction of autoimmunity remains a major challenge in cancer immunotherapy. Here, we show for the first time effective therapeutic vaccination followed by suppression of established spontaneous neuroblastoma metastases using a tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) DNA minigene vaccine. We identified three novel mouse TH (mTH3) derived peptides with high predicted binding affinity to MHC class I antigen H2-K-kappa according to the prediction program SYFPEITHI and computer modeling of epitopes into the MHC class I antigen binding groove. Subsequently, a DNA minigene vaccine was generated based on the expression vector pCMV-F3Ub encoding mutated ubiquitin (Gly(76) to Ala(76)) and mTH3. Prophylactic and therapeutic efficacies of this vaccine were established following oral delivery with attenuated Salmonella typhimurium SL7207. Only mice immunized with mTH3 were free of spontaneous liver metastases. This effect was clearly dependent on ubiquitin and high affinity of the mTH epitopes to MHC class I antigens. Specifically, we showed a crucial role for minigene expression as a stable ubiquitin-Ala 76 fusion peptide for vaccine efficacy. The immune response following the mTH3 DNA minigene vaccination was mediated by CD8(+) T cells as indicated by infiltration of primary tumors and TH-specific cytolytic activity in vitro. Importantly, no cell infiltration was detectable in TH-expressing adrenal medulla, indicating the absence of autoimmunity. In summary, we show effective therapeutic vaccination against neuroblastoma with a novel rationally designed TH minigene vaccine without induction of autoimmunity providing an important baseline for future clinical application of this strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据