4.5 Article

Inhibiting Integrin β8 to Differentiate and Radiosensitize Glioblastoma-Initiating Cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 384-397

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0386

关键词

-

资金

  1. Plan Cancer/ITMO
  2. Recherche Innovation Therapeutique Cancerologie (RITC)
  3. THE program (INSERM, INCa, Plan cancer)
  4. Groupe de Recherche de l'Institut Claudius Regaud (GRICR)
  5. Canceropole Grand Sud-Ouest (GSO)
  6. Association pour la Recherche sur les Tumeurs Cerebrales (ARTC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastomas (GB) are malignant brain tumors with poor prognosis despite treatment with surgery and radio/chemotherapy. These tumors are defined by an important cellular heterogeneity and notably contain a subpopulation of GB-initiating cells (GIC), which contribute to tumor aggressiveness, resistance, and recurrence. Some integrins are specifically expressed by GICs and could be actionable targets to improve GB treatment. Here, integrin beta 8 (ITGB8) was identified as a potential selective target in this highly tumorigenic GIC subpopulation. Using several patient-derived primocultures, it was demonstrated that ITGB8 is overexpressed in GICs compared with their differentiated progeny. Furthermore, ITGB8 is also overexpressed in GB, and its overexpression is correlated with poor prognosis and with the expression of several other classic stem cell markers. Moreover, inhibiting ITGB8 diminished several main GIC characteristics and features, including self-renewal ability, stemness, migration potential, and tumor formation capacity. Blockade of ITGB8 significantly impaired GIC cell viability via apoptosis induction. Finally, the combination of radiotherapy and ITGB8 targeting radiosensitized GICs through postmitotic cell death. Implications: This study identifies ITGB8 as a new selective marker for GICs and as a promising therapeutic target in combination with chemo/radiotherapy for the treatment of highly aggressive brain tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据