4.5 Article

Endothelial Cells Promote Colorectal Cancer Cell Survival by Activating the HER3-AKT Pathway in a Paracrine Fashion

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 20-29

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-18-0341

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA157880]
  2. William C. Liedtke, Jr., Chair in Cancer Research
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K99CA225756] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The regulation of colorectal cancer cell survival pathways remains to be elucidated. Previously, it was demonstrated that endothelial cells (EC) from the liver (liver parenchymal ECs or LPEC), the most common site of colorectal cancer metastases, secrete soluble factors in the conditioned medium (CM) that, in turn, increase the cancer stem cell phenotype in colorectal cancer cells. However, the paracrine effects of LPECs on other colorectal cancer cellular functions have not been investigated. Here, results showed that CM from LPECs increased cell growth and chemoresistance by activating AKT in colorectal cancer cells in vitro. Using an unbiased receptor tyrosine kinase array, it was determined that human epidermal growth factor receptor 3 (ERBB3/HER3) was activated by CM from LPECs, and it mediated AKT activation, cell growth, and chemoresistance in colorectal cancer cells. Inhibition of HER3, either by an inhibitor AZD8931 or an antibody MM-121, blocked LPEC-induced HER3-AKT activation and cell survival in colorectal cancer cells. In addition, CM from LPECs increased in vivo tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model. Furthermore, inhibiting HER3 with AZD8931 significantly blocked tumor growth induced by EC CM. These results demonstrated a paracrine role of liver ECs in promoting cell growth and chemoresistance via activating HER3-AKT in colorectal cancer cells. Implications: This study suggested a potential of treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with HER3 antibodies/inhibitors that are currently being assessed in clinical trials for various cancer types.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据