4.5 Article

Stress-Induced CXCR4 Promotes Migration and Invasion of Ewing Sarcoma

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 953-964

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0668

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH (SARC SPORE) [1U01-CA114757, NHLBI-5T32HL007622, NICHD-5T32HD007513]
  2. University of Michigan's Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA046592]
  3. Liddy Shriver Sarcoma Initiative
  4. Russell G. Adderley Endowment
  5. Nancy Newton Loeb Fund
  6. Evan Shapiro Fund
  7. Go4theGoal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common bone cancer in pediatric patients. Although the primary cause of death in Ewing sarcoma is metastasis, the mechanism underlying tumor spread needs to be elucidated. To this end, the role of the CXCR4/SDF-1a chemokine axis as a mediator of Ewing sarcoma metastasis was investigated. CXCR4 expression status was measured in primary tumor specimens by immunohistochemical staining and in multiple cell lines by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR and flow cytometry. Migration and invasion of CXCR4-positive Ewing sarcoma cells toward CXCL12/SDF-1a were also determined. Interestingly, while CXCR4 status was disparate among Ewing sarcoma cells, ranging from absent to high-level expression, its expression was found to be highly dynamic and responsive to changes in the microenvironment. In particular, upregulation of CXCR4 occurred in cells that were subjected to growth factor deprivation, hypoxia, and space constraints. This upregulation of CXCR4 was rapidly reversed upon removal of the offending cellular stress conditions. Functionally, CXCR4-positive cells migrated and invaded toward an SDF-1a gradient and these aggressive properties were impeded by both the CXCR4 small-molecule inhibitor AMD3100, and by knockdown of CXCR4. In addition, CXCR4-dependent migration and invasion were inhibited by small-molecule inhibitors of Cdc42 and Rac1, mechanistically implicating these Rho-GTPases as downstream mediators of the CXCR4-dependent phenotype. (C) 2014 AACR

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据