4.5 Article

BRAFV600E Cooperates with PI3K Signaling, Independent of AKT, to Regulate Melanoma Cell Proliferation

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 447-463

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-13-0224-T

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/NCI [R01 CA176839]
  2. Institutional Research and Academic Career Development Award (IRACDA)
  3. Melanoma Research Alliance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutationally activated BRAF(V600E) cooperates with PTEN silencing in the conversion of normal melanocytes to metastatic melanoma cells, but the mechanism underlying this cooperation is poorly understood. Here, the consequences of pharmacologic blockade of BRAF(V600E) or phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling were explored using pathway-targeted inhibitors and a panel of human BRAF-mutated melanoma-derived cell lines. Blockade of BRAFF(V600E) -> MEK1/2 -> ERK1/2 or class I PI3K inhibited melanoma proliferation, whereas inhibition of AKT had only modest effects, even in cells with mutated or amplified AKT. Although single-agent inhibition of either BRAFF(V600E) or PI3K signaling elicited antiproliferative effects, combinatorial inhibition was more potent. Analysis of signaling downstream of BRAFF(V600E) or PI3K revealed that these pathways cooperated to regulate protein synthesis through AKT-independent, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1)-dependent effects on p70(S6K), ribosomal protein S6, and 4E-BP1 phosphorylation. Moreover, inhibition of mTORC1/2 inhibited cell proliferation as profoundly as single-agent inhibition of either BRAFF(V600E) or PI3K signaling. These data reveal a mechanism by which BRAFF(V600E) and PI3K signaling cooperate to regulate melanoma proliferation through AKT-independent effects on protein translation. Furthermore, this study provides a potential foundation for pathway-targeted combination therapy designed to enhance the therapeutic benefit to patients with melanoma that contain combined alterations in BRAF and PI3K signaling. (C)2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据