4.5 Article

Suppression of AKT Phosphorylation Restores Rapamycin-Based Synthetic Lethality in SMAD4-Defective Pancreatic Cancer Cells

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 474-481

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-12-0679

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH grant [R01-CA46677]
  2. National Center for Research Resources of the NIH [RP-03037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

mTOR has been implicated in survival signals for many human cancers. Rapamycin and TGF-beta synergistically induce G(1) cell-cycle arrest in several cell lines with intact TGF-beta signaling pathway, which protects cells from the apoptotic effects of rapamycin during S-phase of the cell cycle. Thus, rapamycin is cytostatic in the presence of serum/TGF-beta and cytotoxic in the absence of serum. However, if TGF-beta signaling is defective, rapamycin induced apoptosis in both the presence and absence of serum/TGF-beta in colon and breast cancer cell lines. Because genetic dysregulation of TGF-beta signaling is commonly observed in pancreatic cancers-with defects in the Smad4 gene being most prevalent, we hypothesized that pancreatic cancers would display a synthetic lethality to rapamycin in the presence of serum/TGF-beta. We report here that Smad4-deficient pancreatic cancer cells are killed by rapamycin in the absence of serum; however, in the presence of serum, we did not observe the predicted synthetic lethality with rapamycin. Rapamycin also induced elevated phosphorylation of the survival kinase Akt at Ser473. Suppression of rapamycin-induced Akt phosphorylation restored rapamycin sensitivity in Smad4-null, but not Smad4 wild-type pancreatic cancer cells. This study shows that the synthetic lethality to rapamycin in pancreatic cancers with defective TGF-beta signaling is masked by rapamycin-induced increases in Akt phosphorylation. The implication is that a combination of approaches that suppress both Akt phosphorylation and mTOR could be effective in targeting pancreatic cancers with defective TGF-beta signaling. (C)2013 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据