4.5 Article

Next Generation Sequencing of Serum Circulating Nucleic Acids from Patients with Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer Reveals Differences to Healthy and Nonmalignant Controls

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 335-342

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0314

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Circulating nucleic acids (CNA) isolated from serum or plasma are increasingly recognized as biomarkers for cancers. Recently developed next generation sequencing provides high numbers of DNA sequences to detect the trace amounts of unique serum biomarkers associated with breast carcinoma. Serum CNA of 38 women with ductal carcinoma was extracted and sequenced on a 454/Roche high-throughput GS-FLX platform and compared with healthy controls and patients with other medical conditions. Repetitive elements present in CNA were detected and classified, and each repetitive element was normalized based on total sequence count or repeat count. Multivariate regression models were calculated using an information-theoretical approach and multimodel inference. A total of 423,150 and 953,545 sequences for the cancer patients and controls, respectively, were obtained. Data from 26 patients with stages II to IV tumors and from 67 apparently healthy female controls were used as the training data set. Using a bootstrap method to avoid sampling bias, a five-parameter model was developed. When this model was applied to a validation data set consisting of patients with tumor stage I (n = 10) compared with healthy and nonmalignant disease controls (n = 87; 1,261,561 sequences) a sensitivity of 70% at a specificity of 100% was obtained. At a diagnostic specificity level of 95%, a sensitivity of 90% was calculated. Identification of specific breast cancer-related CNA sequences provides the basis for the development of a serum-based routine laboratory test for breast cancer screening and monitoring. Mol Cancer Res; 8(3); 335-42. (C)2010 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据