4.5 Article

Autoubiquitination of BCA2 RING E3 ligase regulates its own stability and affects cell migration

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 1385-1396

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0094

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1R01CA127258-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulating evidence suggests that ubiquitination plays a role in cancer by changing the function of key cellular proteins. Previously, we isolated BCA2 gene from a library enriched for breast tumor mRNAs. The BCA2 protein is a RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase and is overexpressed in human breast tumors. In order to deduce the biochemical and biological function of BCA2, we searched for BCA2-binding partners using human breast and fetal brain cDNA libraries and BacterioMatch two-hybrid system. We identified 62 interacting partners, the majority of which were found to encode ubiquitin precursor proteins including ubiquitin C and ubiquitin A-52. Using several deletion and point mutants, we found that the BCA2 zinc finger (BZF) domain at the NH2 terminus specifically binds ubiquitin and ubiquitinated proteins. The autoubiquitination activity of BCA2, RING-H2 mutant, BZF mutant, and various lysine mutants of BCA2 were investigated. Our results indicate that the BCA2 protein is strongly ubiquitinated and no ubiquitination is detected with the BCA2 RING-H2 mutant, indicating that the RING domain is essential for autoubiquitination. Mutation of the K26 and K32 lysines in the BZF domain also abrogated autoubiquitination activity. Interestingly, mutation of the K232 and K260 lysines in and near the RING domain resulted in an increase in autoubiquitination activity. Additionally, in cellular migration assays, BCA2 mutants showed altered cell motility compared with wild-type BCA2. On the basis of these findings, we propose that BCA2 might be an important factor regulating breast cancer cell migration/metastasis. We put forward a novel model for BCA2 E3 ligase-mediated cell regulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据