4.5 Article

Interferon regulatory factors IRF5 and IRF7 inhibit growth and induce senescence in immortal Li-Fraumeni fibroblasts

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER RESEARCH
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 770-784

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-0114

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30CA022453, P30 CA022453] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular immortalization is one of the prerequisite steps in carcinogenesis. By gene expression profiling, we have found that genes in the interferon (IFN) pathway were dysregulated during the spontaneous cellular immortalization of fibroblasts from Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) patients with germ-line mutations in p53. IFN signaling pathway genes were down-regulated by epigenetic silencing during immortalization, and some of these same IFN-regulated genes were activated during replicative senescence. Bisulfite sequencing of the promoter regions of two IFN regulatory transcription factors (IRF5 and IRF7) revealed that IRF7, but not IRF5, was epigenetically silenced by methylation of CpG islands in immortal LFS cells. The induction of IRF7 gene by IFN alpha in immortal LFS cells was potentiated by pretreatment with the demethylation agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Overexpression of IRF5 and IRF7 revealed that they can act either alone or in tandem to activate other IFN-regulated genes. In addition, they serve to inhibit the proliferation rate and induce a senescence-related phenotype in immortal LFS cells. Furthermore, polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid treatment of the IRF-overexpressing cells showed a more rapid induction of several IFN-regulated genes. We conclude that the epigenetic inactivation of the IFN pathway plays a critical role in cellular immortalization, and the reactivation of IFN-regulated genes by transcription factors IRF5 and/or IRF7 is sufficient to induce cellular senescence. The IFN pathway may provide valuable molecular targets for therapeutic interventions at early stages of cancer development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据