4.1 Article

Laulimalide and peloruside A inhibit mitosis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by preventing microtubule depolymerisation-dependent steps in chromosome separation and nuclear positioning

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 2842-2852

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3mb70211a

关键词

-

资金

  1. ESR Ltd.
  2. Cancer Society of New Zealand
  3. Wellington Medical Research Foundation
  4. Victoria University of Wellington

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activity and mechanism of action of two microtubule-stabilising agents, laulimalide and peloruside A, were investigated in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast to paclitaxel, both compounds displayed growth inhibitory activity in yeast with wild type TUB2 and were susceptible to the yeast pleiotropic drug efflux pumps, as evidenced by the increased sensitivity of a pump transcription factor knockout strain, pdr1 Delta pdr3 Delta. Laulimalide (IC50 = 3.7 mu M) was 5-fold more potent than peloruside A (IC50 = 19 mu M) in this knockout strain. Bud index assays and flow cytometry revealed a G(2)/M block as seen in mammalian cells subsequent to treatment with these compounds. Furthermore, peloruside A treatment caused an increase in the number of cells with polymerised spindle microtubules. These results indicate an anti-mitotic action of both compounds with tubulin the likely target. This conclusion was supported by laulimalide and peloruside chemogenomic profiling using a yeast deletion library in the pdr1 Delta pdr3 Delta background. The chemogenomic profiles of these compounds indicate that, in contrast to microtubule destabilising agents like nocodazole and benomyl, laulimalide and peloruside A inhibit mitotic processes that are reliant on microtubule depolymerisation, consistent with their ability to stabilise microtubules. Gene deletion strains hypersensitive to laulimalide and peloruside A represent possible targets for drugs that can synergize with microtubule stabilising agent and be of potential use in combination therapy for the treatment of cancer or other diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据