4.1 Article

Biodegradable cross-linked poly(amino alcohol esters) based on LMW PEI for gene delivery

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 1254-1262

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0mb00339e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [20902062, 20972104, 20725206]
  2. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University
  3. Chinese Ministry of Education in China
  4. Scientific Fund of Sichuan Province for Outstanding Young Scientist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polyethylenimine (PEI, especially with M-w of 25 000) has been known as an efficient gene carrier and a gold standard of gene transfection due to its high transfection efficiency (TE). However, high concomitant cytotoxicity limited the application of PEI. In this report, several cationic polymers derived from low molecular weight (LMW) PEI (M-w 600) linked with diglycidyl adipate (DA-PEI) or its analogs (diglycidyl succinate, DS-PEI and diglycidyl oxalate, DO-PEI; D-PEIs for all 3 polymers) were prepared and characterized. GPC gave M(w)s of DA-PEI, DS-PEI and DO-PEI as 6861, 16 015 and 35 281, respectively. Moreover, degradation of the ester-containing DS-PEI was also confirmed by GPC. In addition, hydroxyls in these polymers could improve their water solubility. These polymers exhibited good ability to condense plasmid DNA into nanoparticles with the size of 120-250 nm. zeta-potentials of the polyplexes were found to be around + 10-20 mV under weight ratios (polymer/DNA) from 0.5 to 32. Agarose gel retardation showed that DNA could be released from the polyplexes after being pre-incubated for 30 h. In vitro experiments were carried out and it was found that DS-PEI showed about 5 times of TE compared to that of the PEI/DNA polyplex under a weight ratio of 1 in A549 cells. Meanwhile, the cytotoxicity of D-PEIs assayed by MTT is lower than that of 25 kDa PEI in HEK293 cells. These results suggested that this series of PEI derivatives would be promising non-viral biodegradable vectors for gene delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据