4.1 Article

Impact of linker length on the activity of PROTACs

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 359-364

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0mb00074d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Graduate School Academic Year
  2. Kentucky Opportunity
  3. American Foundation for Pharmaceutical
  4. Markey Cancer Foundation
  5. NIH [CA131059, ES014849]
  6. DoD [W81XWH-08-1-0092]
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA131059] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [R01ES014849] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional genetic approaches have provided a powerful tool in the study of proteins. However, these techniques often preclude selective manipulation of temporal and spatial protein functions, which is crucial for the investigation of dynamic cellular processes. To overcome these limitations, a small molecule-based novel technology termed PROteolysis TArgeting ChimeraS (PROTACs)'' has been developed, targeting proteins for degradation at the post-translational level. Despite the promising potential of PROTACs to serve as molecular probes of complex signaling pathways, their design has not been generalized for broad application. Here, we present the first generalized approach for PROTAC design by fine-tuning the distance between the two participating partner proteins, the E3 ubiquitin ligase and the target protein. As such, we took a chemical approach to create estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha targeting PROTACs with varying linker lengths and the loss of the ER in cultured cells was monitored via western blot and fluorometric analyses. We found a significant effect of chain length on PROTAC efficacy, and, in this case, the optimum distance between the E3 recognition motif and the ligand was a 16 atom chain length. The information gathered from this experiment may offer a generalizable PROTAC design strategy to further the expansion of the PROTAC toolbox, opening new possibilities for the broad application of the PROTAC strategy in the study of multiple signaling pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据