4.1 Article

Efficient non-viral gene delivery mediated by nanostructured calcium carbonate in solution-based transfection and solid-phase transfection

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
卷 7, 期 10, 页码 2841-2847

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c1mb05147d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21074099]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2011CB606202]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among different non-viral gene delivery methods, the technique of co-precipitation of Ca(2+) with DNA in the presence of inorganic anions is an attractive option because of the biocompatibility and biodegradability. In this study, nano-sized CaCO(3)/DNA co-precipitates for gene delivery were prepared. The effect of Ca(2+)/CO(3)(2-) molar ratio on the gene delivery was investigated. The mechanism of the transfection mediated by CaCO(3)/DNA co-precipitates was studied by treatment of the cells with chloroquine, wortmannin and cytochalasin D, respectively. The in vitro gene transfections in different cells were carried out for both solution- based transfection and solid- phase transfection. The gene expression of the calcium carbonate based approach is strongly affected by the Ca(2+)/CO(3)(2-) ratio because the size of CaCO(3)/DNA co-precipitates is mainly determined by the Ca(2+)/CO(3)(2-) ratio. In addition, the encapsulation efficiency of DNA increases with decreasing Ca(2+)/CO(3)(2-) ratio. With a suitable Ca(2+)/CO(3)(2-) ratio, CaCO(3)/DNA co- precipitates could effectively mediate gene transfection with the expression levels higher than that of Lipofectamine 2000 in the presence of serum. The mechanism study shows that CaCO(3)/DNA co-precipitates are internalized via endocytosis of the cells and macropinocytosis is the main route of internalization. Compared with the solution- based transfection, CaCO(3)/DNA co-precipitates in the solid-phase transfection exhibit a lower gene expression level. The calcium carbonate based approach has great potential in gene delivery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据