4.1 Article

A chemiluminescence-based method for identification of histone lysine methyltransferase inhibitors

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOSYSTEMS
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 782-788

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b921912a

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research
  2. NHGRI, NIH
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  4. Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Genome Canada through the Ontario Genomics Institute
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Karolinska Institutet
  7. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  8. Ontario Innovation Trust
  9. Ontario Ministry for Research and Innovation
  10. Merck Co., Inc.
  11. Novartis Research Foundation
  12. Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems
  13. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  14. Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methylation of lysine residues, catalyzed by histone methyltransferase (HMT) enzymes, is one of many modifications of core histone proteins that regulate transcription and chromatin structure. G9a is the predominant HMT in mammalian euchromatin and recent data suggest that it is required to perpetuate a malignant phenotype in cancer cells and is implicated in metastasis, supporting this HMT as a therapeutic target for cancer and other diseases associated with epigenetic regulation. Of the methods currently used to measure methyltransferase activity, many involve a separation step or utilize coupling enzymes complicating implementation and data interpretation. Here we describe a homogeneous assay to measure G9a HMT activity using the chemiluminescence-based Alpha Screen immunoassay technology. Methylation of biotinylated-histone peptide is measured through specific antibody-based detection, in conjunction with streptavidin-coated donor and secondary antibody-coated acceptor beads. The method is particularly well suited for detection of inhibitors acting by the desired histone peptide competitive mechanism and is applicable to testing other HMTs, demonstrated here with the G9a homolog EHMT1, also known as GLP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据