4.5 Article

MiR-21 up-regulation mediates glioblastoma cancer stem cells apoptosis and proliferation by targeting FASLG

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 721-727

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-014-3820-3

关键词

Glioblastoma multiforme; MiR-21; FASLG; Cancer stem cells; U87

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81172408, 81301862, 81172197, 81272716]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate whether miR-21 can affect the apoptosis and proliferation of glioblastoma cancer stem cells (GSCs) from down-regulating FASLG. The expression of miRNA-21 was detected by quantitative real-time PCR in normal brain tissue and glioblastoma samples, and the changes of miRNA-21 expression between GSCs and non-GSCs were also detected. The apoptosis and proliferation ability of miR-21 in GSCs were analyzed by MTT and flow cytometry assay after anti-miR-21 transfection. For the regulation mechanism analysis of miR-21, TargetScan, PicTar and microRNA were selected to predict some potential target genes of miR-21. The predicted gene was identified to be the direct and specific target gene of miR-21 by luciferase activities assay and western blot. RNA interference technology was used to confirm the apoptosis and proliferation effects of miR-21 were directly induced by FASLG. The expression of miR-21 increased significantly in glioblastoma contrast to normal brain tissue, and miR-21 up-regulated in GSCs remarkably. The proliferation of GSCs cell could be inhibited with high-expression of miR-21 and this effect could be restored by miR-21 knocked down. Mechanism analysis revealed that FASLG was a specific and direct target gene of miR-21. The advanced effects of anti-miR-21 on GSCs apoptosis and proliferation were mediated by expression of silenced FASLG. In summary, aberrantly expressed miR-21 regulates GSCs apoptosis and proliferation partly through directly down-regulating FASLG protein expression in GSCs and this might offer a new potential therapeutic stratagem for glioblastoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据