4.5 Article

Binding properties of food colorant allura red with human serum albumin in vitro

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 3381-3391

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-014-3200-z

关键词

Allura red; Human serum albumin; Binding mode; Multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares; Molecular modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31060210, 21167013]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University [SKLF-ZZB-201305, SKLF-ZZA-201302, SKLF-KF-201203]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province [20114BAB204019]
  4. Jiangxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology [20112BBF60010]
  5. Jiangxi Provincial Postgraduate Innovation Fund [YC2013-S049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Allura red (AR) is a widely used colorant in food industry, but may have a potential security risk. In this study, the properties of interaction between AR and human serum albumin (HSA) in vitro were determined by fluorescence, UV-Vis absorption and circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy combining with multivariate curve resolution-alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) chemometrics and molecular modeling approaches. An expanded UV-Vis data matrix was resolved by MCR-ALS method, and the concentration profiles and pure spectra for the three reaction components (AR, HSA, and AR-HSA complex) of the system were then successfully obtained to evaluate the progress interaction of AR with HSA. The calculated thermodynamic parameters indicated that hydrogen binding and hydrophobic interactions played major roles in the binding process, and the interaction induced a decrease in the protein surface hydrophobicity. The competitive experiments revealed that AR mainly located in Sudlow's site I of HSA, and this result was further supported by molecular modeling studies. Analysis of CD spectra found that the addition of AR induced the conformational changes of HSA. This study have provided new insight into the mechanism of interaction between AR and HSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据