4.5 Article

The proteome response of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive barley genotypes to long-term salinity stress

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 6387-6397

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-012-1460-z

关键词

Barley; Hordeum vulgare; Proteomics; Salinity; Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

资金

  1. Center of Excellence of Agronomy, Breeding and Biotechnology of Forage Crops at the University of Tehran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Responses of plants to salinity stress and the development of salt tolerance are extremely complex. Proteomics is a powerful technique to identify proteins associated with a particular environmental or developmental signal. We employed a proteomic approach to further understand the mechanism of plant responses to salinity in a salt-tolerant (Afzal) and a salt-sensitive (Line 527) genotype of barley. At the 4-leaf stage, plants were exposed to 0 (control) or 300 mM NaCl. Salt treatment was maintained for 3 weeks. Total proteins of leaf 4 were extracted and separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. More than 500 protein spots were reproducibly detected. Of these, 44 spots showed significant changes to salt treatment compared to the control: 43 spots were upregulated and 1 spot was downregulated. Using MALDI-TOF-TOF MS, we identified 44 cellular proteins have been identified, which represented 18 different proteins and were classified into seven categories and a group with unknown biological function. These proteins were involved in various many cellular functions. Up regulation of proteins which involved in reactive oxygen species scavenging, signal transduction, protein processing and cell wall may increase plant adaptation to salt stress. The upregulation of the three of four antioxidant proteins (thioredoxin, methionine sulfoxide reductase and dehydroascorbate reductase) in susceptible genotype Line 527 suggesting a different tolerance mechanism (such as tissue tolerance) to tolerate a salinity condition in comparison with the salt sensitive genotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据