4.5 Article

Genotypes, haplotypes and diplotypes of IGF-II SNPs and their association with growth traits in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides)

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 4359-4365

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1223-2

关键词

Largemouth bass; Insulin-like growth factor II; Single nucleotide polymorphism; Haplotype; Diplotype; Growth traits

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30901102]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong, China [9151038001000005]
  3. Science-Technology Supporting Project of the National 'Eleventh Five-Year-Plan' of China [2006BAD01A1209]
  4. Special Fund for Public Welfare Industry (Agriculture) Research [200903045]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Insulin-like growth factor II (IGF-II) is involved in the regulation of somatic growth and metabolism in many fishes. IGF-II is an important candidate gene for growth traits in fishes and its polymorphisms were associated with the growth traits. The aim of this study is to screen single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) IGF-II gene and to analyze potential association between IGF-II gene polymorphisms and growth traits in largemouth bass. Four SNPs (C127T, T1012G, C1836T and C1861T) were detected and verified by DNA sequencing in the largemouth bass IGF-II gene. These SNPs were found to organize into seven haplotypes, which formed 13 diplotypes (haplotype pairs). Association analysis showed that four individual SNPs were not significantly associated with growth traits. Significant associations were, however, noted between diplotypes and growth traits (P < 0.05). The fish with H1H3 (CTCC/CGCC) and H1H5 (CTCC/TTTT) had greater body weight than those with H1H1 (CTCC/CTCC), H1H2 (CTCC/TGTT) and H4H4 (TGCT/TGCT/) did. Our data suggest a significant association between genetic variations in the largemouth bass IGF-II gene and growth traits. IGF-II SNPs could be used as potential genetic markers in future breeding programs of largemouth bass.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据