4.5 Article

HIF-1α mRNA levels in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) exposed to acute and chronic hypoxia

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 4009-4015

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1181-8

关键词

Aquaculture; Eurasian perch; Gene expression; HIF-1 alpha; Hypoxia; Real-time PCR

资金

  1. Regione Lombardia (PERLAVAR-07 project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The big advantage of using molecular biomarkers to monitor oxygen levels in aquatic systems is that responses at the molecular level tend to be more sensitive, and usually occur earlier than those at higher levels of biological organization Aquatic hypoxia is a frequent event, which can occur naturally in a variety of marine, estuarine and freshwater habitats. More often, however, hypoxia arises as a result of euthrophication of aquatic ecosystem and can lead to changes in community structure by eliminating hypoxia-sensitive species. Consequently fish have develop various physiological and biochemical mechanisms to cope with this environmental stress. Many of these adjustments depend to changes in expression of a wide range of genes. The transcriptional responses to hypoxia are primarily mediated by hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), a heterodimer composed of an alpha and beta subunit. This study investigated if HIF-1 alpha mRNA levels were regulated by hypoxia in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis), a hypoxia-sensitive fresh water species. The real-time PCR was utilized to monitor dynamic changes in levels of HIF-1 alpha mRNA in response to acute (DO 0.4 +/- A 0.1 mg/l for 1 h) and chronic (DO 2.8 +/- A 0.3 mg/l for 15 days) hypoxia. Our results indicated an up-regulation of HIF-1 alpha in brain and liver, but not in muscle tissue after acute hypoxic treatment, whereas significant changes of HIF-1 alpha mRNA levels were detected in muscle, but not in brain and liver after chronic hypoxia exposure. This study suggests that HIF-1 alpha mRNA level in selected perch tissues could be an useful indicator of acute exposure to hypoxia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据