4.5 Article

Identification of a recurrent insertion mutation in the LDLR gene in a Pakistani family with autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 37, 期 8, 页码 3869-3875

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-010-0043-0

关键词

Familial hypercholesterolemia; Low density lipoprotein receptor; Insertion mutation

资金

  1. Higher Education Commission of Pakistan [934]
  2. Shifa College of Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH) results in elevated levels of blood lipids including total cholesterol (TC) and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with normal triglycerides (TG). This disease is one of the major contributors towards an early onset of coronary heart disease (CHD). The aim of the present study was to identify the genes responsible for causing FH in Pakistani population, for this purpose a large consanguineous FH family was selected for genetic analysis. Serum lipid levels, including TC, TG, LDL-C and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), were determined in patients and healthy controls. In order to find the causative mutation in this family, direct sequencing of the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene was performed. In addition the part of the Apolipoprotein-B (APOB) gene containing the mutations R3500Q and R3500W was also sequenced. Affected individuals of the family were found to have raised TC and LDL-C levels. Sequencing revealed an insertion mutation (c.2416_2417InsG) in exon 17 of the LDLR gene in all the affected individuals of the family. Common FH causing APOB mutations were not present in this family. Heterozygous individuals had TC levels ranging from similar to 300-500 mg/dl and the only homozygous individual with typical xanthomas had TC levels exceeding 900 mg/dl. This is the first report of a known LDLR gene mutation causing FH in the Pakistani population. Despite a large heterogeneity of LDLR mutations there are still some common mutations which are responsible for FH throughout the world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据