4.8 Article

The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: Multitissue gene regulation in humans

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 348, 期 6235, 页码 648-660

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1262110

关键词

-

资金

  1. Common Fund of the Office of the Director, U.S. National Institutes of Health
  2. NCI
  3. NHGRI
  4. NHLBI
  5. NIDA
  6. NIMH
  7. NIA
  8. NIAID
  9. NINDS through NIH [HHSN261200800001E, 10XS170, 10XS171, 12ST1039, 10ST1035, HHSN268201000029C]
  10. European Research Council
  11. Swiss National Science Foundation
  12. Louis-Jeantet Foundation
  13. Wellcome Trust [098381]
  14. Clarendon Scholarship
  15. NDM Studentship
  16. Univ. of Oxford Green Templeton College Award
  17. NIH [R01 DA006227-17, R01 MH090941, R01 MH090951, R01 MH090937, R01 MH090936, R01 MH090948, R01 GM104371, R01AG046170, R01CA163772, U01AI111598-01]
  18. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10099] Funding Source: researchfish
  19. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  20. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1310002] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the functional consequences of genetic variation, and how it affects complex human disease and quantitative traits, remains a critical challenge for biomedicine. We present an analysis of RNA sequencing data from 1641 samples across 43 tissues from 175 individuals, generated as part of the pilot phase of the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. We describe the landscape of gene expression across tissues, catalog thousands of tissue-specific and shared regulatory expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) variants, describe complex network relationships, and identify signals from genome-wide association studies explained by eQTLs. These findings provide a systematic understanding of the cellular and biological consequences of human genetic variation and of the heterogeneity of such effects among a diverse set of human tissues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据