4.5 Article

The complete mitogenome and phylogenetic analysis of Bombyx mandarina strain Qingzhou

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 2599-2608

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-009-9781-2

关键词

Bombyx mandarina; Mitochondrial DNA; Bombyx mori; Molecular phylogeny; Nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30571404, 30671590]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2006AA10A119]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [2005CB121000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complete nucleotide sequence of the mitogenome of Bombyx mandarina strain Qingzhou was determined. The circular genome is 15,717 bp long and has the typical gene organization and order of lepidopteran mitogenomes. All protein-coding sequences are initiated with a typical ATN codon, except the COI gene, which has a 4-bp TTAG putative initiator codon. Eleven of the 13 protein-coding gene have a complete termination codon (all TAA), but the remaining two genes terminate with incomplete codons. All transfer RNAs (tRNAs) have a clover-leaf structure typical of the mitochondrial tRNAs, and some of them have a mismatch in the four-stem-and-loop structure. The length of the A + T rich region of B. mandarina strain Qingzhou is 495 bp, shorter than that of B. mandarina strain Tsukuba (747 bp) but similar to that of Bombyx mori. Phylogenetic analysis based on the whole mitochondrial genome sequences of the available sequenced species (B. mori strains C-108, Aojuku, Backokjam, and Xiafang, B. mandarina strains Tsukuba, Ankang, and Qingzhou, and Antheraea pernyi) shows the origin of the domesticated silkmoth B. mori to be the Chinese B. mandarina. Nuclear mitochondrial pseudogene sequences were detected in the nuclear genome of B. mori with the MEGA BLAST search program. A phylogenetic analysis of these nuclear mitochondrial pseudogene sequences suggests that B. mori was domesticated independently in different areas and periods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据