4.5 Article

Effects of propofol on pro-inflammatory cytokines and nuclear factor kappaB during polymicrobial sepsis in rats

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 36, 期 8, 页码 2345-2351

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-009-9456-z

关键词

Propofol; Polymicrobial sepsis; Tumor necrosis factor alpha; Interleukin 6; Nuclear factor kappaB

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China [2002AB147]
  2. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, Wuhan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kappa B) plays a central role in regulating the transcription of several genes associated with sepsis/septic shock. Therefore, the author investigated the effects of propofol on the plasma tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6 (TNF-alpha and IL-6) levels and NF-kappa B activation during polymicrobial sepsis in rats. Male Sprague-Dawlay rats were subjected to cecal ligation and puncture (CLP, a model of polymicrobial sepsis) or sham operation. The animals were randomly assigned into four equal groups (n = 10): sham CLP group, CLP group, PPF (propofol) I group and PPF II group. Thirty minutes before CLP, propofol (5 and 10 mg kg(-1) h(-1), respectively) was infused continuously through the left femoral vein cannula in PPF I group or PPF II group, CLP group and sham CLP group receiving 0.9% saline only at the rates of 5 ml kg(-1) h(-1). The right femoral artery was cannulated to monitor mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rates (HR). CLP produced progressive hypotension and a first increase followed by a decrease in HR. The plasma TNF-alpha and IL-6 levels and the hepatic NF-kappa B activation significantly increased after CLP alone. Compared with CLP group, propofol treatment reversed hypotension, slightly steadied heartbeats, and decreased the plasma TNF-alpha and IL-6 levels, and significantly suppressed NF-kappa B activation. Propofol has inhibited the hepatic NF-kappa B activition and the pro-inflammatory cytokine response during polymicrobial sepsis in rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据