4.5 Article

Identification of HSP27 as a potential tumor marker for colorectal cancer by the two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORTS
卷 37, 期 7, 页码 3207-3216

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11033-009-9903-x

关键词

Colorectal cancer; Proteomics; Biomarker; HSP27

资金

  1. Shanghai Science and Technology Development Fund [05DJ14010]
  2. Major Basic Research Program of Shanghai [07DZ19505]
  3. National 973 Basic Research Program of China [2008CB517403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of specific biomarkers for colorectal cancer would provide the basis for early diagnosis, prognosis, therapy, as well as clues for understanding the molecular mechanisms governing cancer progression. This study was designed to use comparative proteomics technology to find the differentially expressed proteins between human colorectal carcinoma and the corresponding normal tumor-adjacent colorectal tissues. We have used the highly sensitive two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) coupled with matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) for the identification of proteins differentially expressed in tumoral and neighboring normal mucosa. We have detected differences in abundance of 42 proteins with statistical variance of the tumor versus normal spot volume ratio within the 95th confidence level (Student's t-test; P < 0.05). 10 out of 42 analyzed proteins were unambiguously identified by MS coupled with database interrogation as being differentially expressed in colorectal cancer. Of the 10 newly implicated proteins, HSP27 was chosen for detailed analysis. Preliminary studies demonstrated that the differentially expressed proteins found by 2-DE could be confirmed and validated by western blotting and immunohistochemistry analyses in those few cases. The results suggest that HSP27 might be a potential biomarker for early diagnosis, prognosis, monitoring in the therapy of colorectal carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据