4.4 Article

The HOPS complex mediates autophagosome-lysosome fusion through interaction with syntaxin 17

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 1327-1337

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E13-08-0447

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [25111005]
  2. Naito Foundation
  3. China Scholarship Council in China
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  5. Funding Program for Next Generation World-Leading Researchers
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25111005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Membrane fusion is generally controlled by Rabs, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs), and tethering complexes. Syntaxin 17 (STX17) was recently identified as the autophagosomal SNARE required for autophagosome- lysosome fusion in mammals and Drosophila. In this study, to better understand the mechanism of autophagosome-lysosome fusion, we searched for STX17-interacting proteins. Immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analysis identified vacuolar protein sorting 33A (VPS33A) and VPS16, which are components of the homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS)-tethering complex. We further confirmed that all HOPS components were coprecipitated with STX17. Knockdown of VPS33A, VPS16, or VPS39 blocked autophagic flux and caused accumulation of STX17- and microtubule-associated protein light chain (LC3)-positive autophagosomes. The endocytic pathway was also affected by knockdown of VPS33A, as previously reported, but not by knockdown of STX17. By contrast, ultraviolet irradiation resistance- associated gene (UVRAG), a known HOPS-interacting protein, did not interact with the STX17-HOPS complex and may not be directly involved in autophagosome-lysosome fusion. Collectively these results suggest that, in addition to its well-established function in the endocytic pathway, HOPS promotes autophagosome-lysosome fusion through interaction with STX17.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据