4.4 Article

CD81 regulates cell migration through its association with Rac GTPase

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 261-273

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E12-09-0642

关键词

-

资金

  1. Instituto de Salud Carlos III [PI080794, PI11/01645]
  2. ERC [AdG-2011]
  3. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia [BIO2009-07990]
  4. Comunidad de Madrid [CAM BIO/0194/2006]
  5. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Instituto Salud Carlos III) [RECAVA RD06/0014]
  6. National Institutes of Health [GM23244]
  7. Cell Migration Consortium [U54 GM064346]
  8. [SAF2011-25834]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD81 is a member of the tetraspanin family that has been described to have a key role in cell migration of tumor and immune cells. To unravel the mechanisms of CD81-regulated cell migration, we performed proteomic analyses that revealed an interaction of the tetraspanin C-terminal domain with the small GTPase Rac. Direct interaction was confirmed biochemically. Moreover, microscopy cross-correlation analysis demonstrated the in situ integration of both molecules into the same molecular complex. Pull-down experiments revealed that CD81-Rac interaction was direct and independent of Rac activation status. Knockdown of CD81 resulted in enhanced protrusion rate, altered focal adhesion formation, and decreased cell migration, correlating with increased active Rac. Reexpression of wildtype CD81, but not its truncated form lacking the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain, rescued these effects. The phenotype of CD81 knockdown cells was mimicked by treatment with a soluble peptide with the C-terminal sequence of the tetraspanin. Our data show that the interaction of Rac with the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of CD81 is a novel regulatory mechanism of the GTPase activity turnover. Furthermore, they provide a novel mechanism for tetraspanin-dependent regulation of cell motility and open new avenues for tetraspanin-targeted reagents by the use of cell-permeable peptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据