4.4 Article

Physiological type I collagen organization induces the formation of a novel class of linear invadosomes

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 297-309

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-07-0594

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  2. La Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
  3. Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer/Institut National du Cancer
  4. Equipe Labellisee
  5. [ANR-06-BLAN-0362]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Invadosomes are F-actin structures capable of degrading the matrix through the activation of matrix metalloproteases. As fibrillar type I collagen promotes pro-matrix metalloproteinase 2 activation by membrane type 1 matrix metalloproteinase, we aimed at investigating the functional relationships between collagen I organization and invadosome induction. We found that fibrillar collagen I induced linear F-actin structures, distributed along the fibrils, on endothelial cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, and tumor cells. These structures share features with conventional invadosomes, as they express cortactin and N-WASP and accumulate the scaffold protein Tks5, which proved essential for their formation. On the basis of their ability to degrade extracellular matrix elements and their original architecture, we named these structures linear invadosomes. Interestingly, podosomes or invadopodia were replaced by linear invadosomes upon contact of the cells with fibrillar collagen I. However, linear invadosomes clearly differ from classical invadosomes, as they do not contain paxillin, vinculin, and beta 1/beta 3 integrins. Using knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts and RGD peptide, we demonstrate that linear invadosome formation and activity are independent of beta 1 and beta 3 integrins. Finally, linear invadosomes also formed in a three-dimensional collagen matrix. This study demonstrates that fibrillar collagen I is the physiological inducer of a novel class of invadosomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据