4.4 Article

Insights into EB1 structure and the role of its C-terminal domain for discriminating microtubule tips from the lattice

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 22, 期 16, 页码 2912-2923

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E11-01-0017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federation of European Biochemical Societies
  2. Juan de la Cierva program
  3. European Union 7th Framework Program PROSPECTS
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation
  5. European Molecular Biology Organization
  6. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research, Earth and Life Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

End-binding proteins (EBs) comprise a conserved family of microtubule plus end-tracking proteins. The concerted action of calponin homology (CH), linker, and C-terminal domains of EBs is important for their autonomous microtubule tip tracking, regulation of microtubule dynamics, and recruitment of numerous partners to microtubule ends. Here we report the detailed structural and biochemical analysis of mammalian EBs. Small-angle X-ray scattering, electron microscopy, and chemical cross-linking in combination with mass spectrometry indicate that EBs are elongated molecules with two interacting CH domains, an arrangement reminiscent of that seen in other microtubule-and actin-binding proteins. Removal of the negatively charged C-terminal tail did not affect the overall conformation of EBs; however, it increased the dwell times of EBs on the microtubule lattice in microtubule tip-tracking reconstitution experiments. An even more stable association with the microtubule lattice was observed when the entire negatively charged C-terminal domain of EBs was replaced by a neutral coiled-coil motif. In contrast, the interaction of EBs with growing microtubule tips was not significantly affected by these C-terminal domain mutations. Our data indicate that long-range electrostatic repulsive interactions between the C-terminus and the microtubule lattice drive the specificity of EBs for growing microtubule ends.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据