4.4 Article

Lens Fiber Cell Differentiation and Denucleation Are Disrupted through Expression of the N-Terminal Nuclear Receptor Box of Ncoa6 and Result in p53-dependent and p53-independent Apoptosis

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 21, 期 14, 页码 2453-2468

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E09-12-1031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01EY-012200, EY-014237, CA-119689]
  3. Irma T. Hirschl Career Scientist Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nuclear receptor coactivator 6 (NCOA6) is a multifunctional protein implicated in embryonic development, cell survival, and homeostasis. An 81-amino acid fragment, dnNCOA6, containing the N-terminal nuclear receptor box (LXXLL motif) of NCOA6, acts as a dominant-negative (dn) inhibitor of NCOA6. Here, we expressed dnNCOA6 in postmitotic transgenic mouse lens fiber cells. The transgenic lenses showed reduced growth; a wide spectrum of lens fiber cell differentiation defects, including reduced expression of gamma-crystallins; and cataract formation. Those lens fiber cells entered an alternate proapoptotic pathway, and the denucleation (karyolysis) process was stalled. Activation of caspase-3 at embryonic day (E) 13.5 was followed by double-strand breaks (DSBs) formation monitored via a biomarker, gamma-H2AX. Intense terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) signals were found at E16.5. Thus, a window of similar to 72 h between these events suggested prolonged though incomplete apoptosis in the lens fiber cell compartment that preserved nuclei in its cells. Genetic experiments showed that the apoptotic-like processes in the transgenic lens were both p53-dependent and p53-independent. Lens-specific deletion of Ncoa6 also resulted in disrupted lens fiber cell differentiation. Our data demonstrate a cell-autonomous role of Ncoa6 in lens fiber cell differentiation and suggest novel insights into the process of lens fiber cell denucleation and apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据