4.4 Article

LIM Kinase 1 and Cofilin Regulate Actin Filament Population Required for Dynamin-dependent Apical Carrier Fission from the Trans-Golgi Network

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 438-451

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E08-08-0891

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natioanl Institutes of Health [GM-34107, EY-08538]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation
  3. Dyson Foundation
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
  5. DFG
  6. Kultusministerium of the Land Sachsen-Anhalt
  7. NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE [R01EY008538] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM034107] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The functions of the actin cytoskeleton in post-Golgi trafficking are still poorly understood. Here, we report the role of LIM Kinase 1 (LIMK1) and its substrate cofilin in the trafficking of apical and basolateral proteins in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Our data indicate that LIMK1 and cofilin organize a specialized population of actin filaments at the Golgi complex that is selectively required for the emergence of an apical cargo route to the plasma membrane (PM). Quantitative pulse-chase live imaging experiments showed that overexpression of kinase-dead LIMK1 (LIMK1-KD), or of LIMK1 small interfering RNA, or of an activated cofilin mutant (cofilin S3A), selectively slowed down the exit from the trans-Golgi network (TGN) of the apical PM marker p75-green fluorescent protein (GFP) but did not interfere with the apical PM marker glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-YFP or the basolateral PM marker neural cell adhesion molecule-GFP. High-resolution live imaging experiments of carrier formation and release by the TGN and analysis of peri-Golgi actin dynamics using photoactivatable GFP suggest a scenario in which TGN-localized LIMK1-cofilin regulate a population of actin filaments required for dynamin-syndapin-cortactin-dependent generation and/or fission of precursors to p75 transporters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据