4.4 Article

Gcn4 is required for the response to peroxide stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 2995-3007

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1173

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Manchester
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the United Kingdom
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E00623X/1, BB/B000028/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. BBSRC [BB/E00623X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An oxidative stress occurs when reactive oxygen species overwhelm the cellular antioxidant defenses. We have examined the regulation of protein synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to oxidative stress induced by exposure to hydroperoxides (hydrogen peroxide, and cumene hydroperoxide), a thiol oxidant (diamide), and a heavy metal (cadmium). Examination of translational activity indicates that these oxidants inhibit translation at the initiation and postinitiation phases. Inhibition of translation initiation in response to hydroperoxides is entirely dependent on phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF)2 by the Gcn2 kinase. Activation of Gcn2 is mediated by uncharged tRNA because mutation of its HisRS domain abolishes regulation in response to hydroperoxides. Furthermore, Gcn4 is translationally up-regulated in response to H2O2, and it is required for hydroperoxide resistance. We used transcriptional profiling to identify a wide range of genes that mediate this response as part of the Gcn4-dependent H2O2-regulon. In contrast to hydroperoxides, regulation of translation initiation in response to cadmium and diamide depends on both Gcn2 and the eIF4E binding protein Eap1. Thus, the response to oxidative stress is mediated by oxidant-specific regulation of translation initiation, and we suggest that this is an important mechanism underlying the ability of cells to adapt to different oxidants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据