4.8 Article

Transcribed enhancers lead waves of coordinated transcription in transitioning mammalian cells

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 347, 期 6225, 页码 1010-1014

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.1259418

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  2. Research Grants for RIKEN Preventive Medicine and Diagnosis Innovation Program
  3. RIKEN Centre for Life Science Technologies, Division of Genomic Technologies (from the MEXT, Japan)
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/D/20211551, BBS/E/D/20211550, BBS/E/D/20251969, BBS/E/D/20211552, BB/H008098/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_U120061476] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF10SA1016550, NNF12OC1016371] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. BBSRC [BBS/E/D/20211552, BB/H008098/1, BBS/E/D/20211550, BBS/E/D/20251969, BBS/E/D/20211551] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MC_U120061476] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25118732, 26670472, 26293229, 24689042] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it is generally accepted that cellular differentiation requires changes to transcriptional networks, dynamic regulation of promoters and enhancers at specific sets of genes has not been previously studied en masse. Exploiting the fact that active promoters and enhancers are transcribed, we simultaneously measured their activity in 19 human and 14 mouse time courses covering a wide range of cell types and biological stimuli. Enhancer RNAs, then messenger RNAs encoding transcription factors, dominated the earliest responses. Binding sites for key lineage transcription factors were simultaneously overrepresented in enhancers and promoters active in each cellular system. Our data support a highly generalizable model in which enhancer transcription is the earliest event in successive waves of transcriptional change during cellular differentiation or activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据