4.8 Article

The dominant role of semi-arid ecosystems in the trend and variability of the land CO2 sink

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 348, 期 6237, 页码 895-899

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa1668

关键词

-

资金

  1. Royal Physiographic Society in Lund (Birgit and Hellmuth Hertz Foundation)
  2. Swedish Research Council [637-2014-6895]
  3. Mistra-SWECIA program
  4. EC [603542, 282672]
  5. OCE
  6. Australian Climate Change Science Program
  7. NSF [AGS 12-43071, AGS-1129088]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0006706]
  9. NASA LCLUC program [NNX14AD94G]
  10. Ministry of Environment of Japan
  11. CSIRO
  12. NOAA [NA10OAR4310248, NA09NES4400006]
  13. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0006706] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  14. NERC [NE/J010154/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/J010154/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Office of Integrative Activities
  17. Office Of The Director [1443108] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The growth rate of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations since industrialization is characterized by large interannual variability, mostly resulting from variability in CO2 uptake by terrestrial ecosystems (typically termed carbon sink). However, the contributions of regional ecosystems to that variability are not well known. Using an ensemble of ecosystem and land-surface models and an empirical observation-based product of global gross primary production, we show that the mean sink, trend, and interannual variability in CO2 uptake by terrestrial ecosystems are dominated by distinct biogeographic regions. Whereas the mean sink is dominated by highly productive lands (mainly tropical forests), the trend and interannual variability of the sink are dominated by semi- arid ecosystems whose carbon balance is strongly associated with circulation- driven variations in both precipitation and temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据