4.8 Article

RNA-Seq of single prostate CTCs implicates noncanonical Wnt signaling in antiandrogen resistance

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 349, 期 6254, 页码 1351-1356

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aab0917

关键词

-

资金

  1. Prostate Cancer Foundation
  2. Charles Evans Foundation
  3. Department of Defense
  4. Stand Up to Cancer
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  6. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
  7. NIH [EB008047]
  8. NCI [2RO1CA129933]
  9. National Cancer Institute, NCI
  10. Federal Share Program and Income
  11. Affymetrix, Inc.
  12. Mazzone Program-Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center
  13. Burroughs Wellcome Fund
  14. Massachusetts General Hospital-Johnson & Johnson Center for Excellence in CTC Technologies
  15. Janssen LLC.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prostate cancer is initially responsive to androgen deprivation, but the effectiveness of androgen receptor (AR) inhibitors in recurrent disease is variable. Biopsy of bone metastases is challenging; hence, sampling circulating tumor cells (CTCs) may reveal drug-resistance mechanisms. We established single-cell RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) profiles of 77 intact CTCs isolated from 13 patients (mean six CTCs per patient), by using microfluidic enrichment. Single CTCs from each individual display considerable heterogeneity, including expression of AR gene mutations and splicing variants. Retrospective analysis of CTCs from patients progressing under treatment with an AR inhibitor, compared with untreated cases, indicates activation of noncanonical Wnt signaling (P = 0.0064). Ectopic expression of Wnt5a in prostate cancer cells attenuates the antiproliferative effect of AR inhibition, whereas its suppression in drug-resistant cells restores partial sensitivity, a correlation also evident in an established mouse model. Thus, single-cell analysis of prostate CTCs reveals heterogeneity in signaling pathways that could contribute to treatment failure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据