4.8 Article

Gene Duplication and Loss in a MADS Box Gene Transcription Factor Circuit

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 3367-3380

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msr169

关键词

MADS box; flower; gene duplication; gene network; euasterids

资金

  1. Korea Research Foundation
  2. Korean Government (MOEHRD) [KRF-2007-357-C00110]
  3. Yale University Center for Genomics and Proteomics
  4. National Science Foundation [IBN-0817744]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although many models have been proposed that could lead to the maintenance of gene duplicates, the ways in which interacting gene duplicates influence each other's evolution and function remain poorly understood. Here, we focus on duplication and loss of the B class MADS box transcription factor genes in the euasterids I and the ramifications of such changes on paralog evolution and their encoded functions. In core eudicots, the B class genes belong to two paralogous lineages whose products form obligate heterodimers. Based on comparative genomic and phylogenetic analyses, we show that five stepwise B class MADS box gene gain or loss events occurred during the radiation of the euasterids I within core eudicots. Gene loss in one sublineage was correlated with a deficit of other sublineage genes. We also show that the gain or loss of B class MADS box gene paralogs were associated with altered protein-protein interactions among the remaining copies. These altered protein interactions were correlated with asymmetric patterns of sequence diversification and selection, suggesting that compensatory changes were driving the evolution of such genes. Furthermore, these B class MADS box gene gain or loss events were associated with the evolutionary divergence of floral morphology in the euasterids I. Together, these observations point to a cooperative strategy by which gene networks evolve, with selection maintaining the overall logic of a network despite changes in individual components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据