4.8 Article

Transposable Elements: Insertion Pattern and Impact on Gene Expression Evolution in Hominids

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 27, 期 8, 页码 1955-1962

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq084

关键词

transposable elements; expression divergence; alternative splicing; insertion bias; Homo sapiens; Pan troglodytes

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  2. University of Sussex
  3. BBSRC [BB/F011113/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F011113/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transposable elements (TEs) can affect the regulation of nearby genes through several mechanisms. Here, we examine to what extent recent TE insertions have contributed to the evolution of gene expression in hominids. We compare expression levels of human and chimpanzee orthologs and detect a weak increase in expression divergence (ED) for genes with species-specific TE insertions compared with unaffected genes. However, we show that genes with TE insertions predating the human-chimpanzee split also exhibit a similar increase in ED and therefore conclude that the increase is not due to the transcriptional influence of the TEs. These results are further confirmed by lineage-specific analysis of ED, using rhesus macaque as an outgroup: Human-chimpanzee ortholog pairs, where one ortholog has suffered TE insertion but not the other, do not show increased ED along the lineage where the insertion occurred, relative to the other lineage. We also show that genes with recent TE insertions tend to produce more alternative transcripts but find no evidence that the TEs themselves promote transcript diversity. Finally, we observe that TEs are enriched upstream relative to downstream of genes and show that this is due to insertional bias, rather than selection, because this bias is only observed in genes expressed in the germ line. This provides an alternative neutral explanation for the accumulation of TEs in upstream sequences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据