4.8 Article

Learning to Count: Robust Estimates for Labeled Distances between Molecular Sequences

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 801-814

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp003

关键词

robust counting; labeled codon distance; empirical distribution; Markov chain substitution model

资金

  1. UCLA Dissertation Year Fellowship
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences Systems
  3. Integrative Biology Training Grant
  4. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  5. John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Fellowship
  6. National Institutes of Health [R01 GM086887]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Researchers routinely estimate distances between molecular sequences using continuous-time Markov chain models. We present a new method, robust counting, that protects against the possibly severe bias arising from model misspecification. We achieve this robustness by generalizing the conventional distance estimation to incorporate the empirical distribution of site patterns found in the observed pairwise sequence alignment. Our flexible framework allows for computing distances based only on a subset of possible substitutions. From this, we show how to estimate labeled codon distances, such as expected numbers of synonymous or nonsynonymous substitutions. We present two simulation studies. The first compares the relative bias and variance of conventional and robust labeled nucleotide estimators. In the second simulation, we demonstrate that robust counting furnishes accurate synonymous and nonsynonymous distance estimates based only on easy-to-fit models of nucleotide substitution, bypassing the need for computationally expensive codon models. We conclude with three empirical examples. In the first two examples, we investigate the evolutionary dynamics of the influenza A hemagglutinin gene using labeled codon distances. In the final example, we demonstrate the advantages of using robust synonymous distances to alleviate the effect of convergent evolution on phylogenetic analysis of an HIV transmission network.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据