4.8 Article

Protease Gene Duplication and Proteolytic Activity in Drosophila Female Reproductive Tracts

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 26, 期 9, 页码 2125-2134

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp121

关键词

gene duplication; protease; reproductive protein; female reproductive tract; sexual conflict

资金

  1. Doctoral Dissertation Improvement
  2. National Institutes of Health [AI31951]
  3. National Science Foundation
  4. Functional and Computational Genomics
  5. University of Arizona and a Dissertation Fellowship
  6. American Association of University Women

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Secreted proteases play integral roles in sexual reproduction in a broad range of taxa. In the genetic model Drosophila melanogaster, these molecules are thought to process peptides and activate enzymes inside female reproductive tracts, mediating critical postmating responses. A recent study of female reproductive tract proteins in the cactophilic fruit fly Drosophila arizonae, identified pervasive, lineage-specific gene duplication amongst secreted proteases. Here, we compare the evolutionary dynamics, biochemical nature, and physiological significance of secreted female reproductive serine endoproteases between D. arizonae and its congener D. melanogaster. We show that D. arizonae lower female reproductive tract (LFRT) proteins are significantly enriched for recently duplicated secreted proteases, particularly serine endoproteases, relative to D. melanogaster. Isolated lumen from D. arizonae LFRTs, furthermore, exhibits significant trypsin-like and elastase-like serine endoprotease acitivity, whereas no such activity is seen in D. melanogaster. Finally, trypsin- and elastase-like activity in D. arizonae female reproductive tracts is negatively regulated by mating. We propose that the intense proteolytic environment of the D. arizonae female reproductive tract relates to the extraordinary reproductive physiology of this species and that ongoing gene duplication amongst these proteases is an evolutionary consequence of sexual conflict.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据