4.8 Article

The capsid of the T4 phage superfamily: The evolution, diversity, and structure of some of the most prevalent proteins in the biosphere

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 1321-1332

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn080

关键词

bacteriophage T4; major capsid protein; evolution; structure; diversity; metagenomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Escherichia coli bacteriophage T4 has served as a classic system in phage biology for more than 60 years. Only recently have phylogenetic analyses and genomic comparisons demonstrated the existence of a large, diverse, and widespread superfamily of T4-like phages in the environment. We report here on the T4-like major capsid protein (MCP) sequences that were obtained by targeted polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of marine environmental samples. This analysis was then expanded to include 1,000s of new sequences of T4-like capsid genes from the metagenomic data obtained during the Sorcerer II Global Ocean Sampling (GOS) expedition. This data compilation reveals that the diversity of the major and minor capsid proteins from the GOS metagenome follows the same general patterns as the sequences from cultured phage genomes. Interestingly, the new MCP sequences obtained by PCR targeted to MCP sequences in environmental samples are more divergent (deeper branching) than the vast majority of the MCP sequences coming from the other sources. The marine T4-like phage population appears to be largely dominated by the T4-like cyanophages. Using similar to 1,400 T4-like MCP sequences from various sources, we mapped the degree of sequence conservation on a structural model of the T4-like MCP. The results indicate that within the T4 superfamily there are some clear phylogenetic groups with regard to the more conserved and more variable domains of the MCP. Such differences can be correlated with variations in capsid morphology, the arrangement of the MCP lattice, and the presence of different capsid accessory proteins between the subgroups of the T4 superfamily.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据