期刊
SCIENCE
卷 348, 期 6241, 页码 1358-1361出版社
AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aaa5099
关键词
-
资金
- NSF [EAGER-IOS-1250895, PHY-0848755, IOS-1355061, EAGER-IOS-1251585]
- Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
- Princeton University
- NIH [T32HG003284]
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L006081/1]
- Office of Naval Research [N00014-09-1-1074, N00014-14-1-0635]
- Army Research Office [W911NG-11-1-0385, W911NF-14-1-0431]
- Human Frontier Science Program [RGP0065/2012]
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L006081/1] Funding Source: researchfish
- BBSRC [BB/L006081/1] Funding Source: UKRI
- Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
- Direct For Biological Sciences [1251585, 1250895] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
- Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
- Direct For Biological Sciences [1355061] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Conflicts of interest about where to go and what to do are a primary challenge of group living. However, it remains unclear how consensus is achieved in stable groups with stratified social relationships. Tracking wild baboons with a high-resolution global positioning system and analyzing their movements relative to one another reveals that a process of shared decision-making governs baboon movement. Rather than preferentially following dominant individuals, baboons are more likely to follow when multiple initiators agree. When conflicts arise over the direction of movement, baboons choose one direction over the other when the angle between them is large, but they compromise if it is not. These results are consistent with models of collective motion, suggesting that democratic collective action emerging from simple rules is widespread, even in complex, socially stratified societies.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据