4.6 Review

The role of imprinted genes in humans

期刊

MOLECULAR ASPECTS OF MEDICINE
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 826-840

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2012.06.009

关键词

Epigenetics; Genomic imprinting; Fetal growth; Imprinting disorders; Methylation; Placenta

资金

  1. Medical Research Council, Wellbeing of Women
  2. Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children Charity
  3. Medical Research Council [G1001689, G0801438] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0801438, G1001689] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic imprinting, a process of epigenetic modification which allows the gene to be expressed in a parent-of-origin specific manner, has an essential role in normal growth and development. Imprinting is found predominantly in placental mammals, and has potentially evolved as a mechanism to balance parental resource allocation to the offspring. Therefore, genetic and epigenetic disruptions which alter the specific dosage of imprinted genes can lead to various developmental abnormalities often associated with fetal growth and neurological behaviour. Over the past 20 years since the first imprinted gene was discovered, many different mechanisms have been implicated in this special regulatory mode of gene expression. This review includes a brief summary of the current understanding of the key molecular events taking place during imprint establishment and maintenance in early embryos, and their relationship to epigenetic disruptions seen in imprinting disorders. Genetic and epigenetic causes of eight recognised imprinting disorders including Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS), and also their association with Assisted reproductive technology (ART) will be discussed. Finally, the role of imprinted genes in fetal growth will be explored by investigating their relationship to a common growth disorder, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and also their potential role in regulating normal growth variation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据