4.3 Article

Histone deacetylase inhibition promotes Caspase-independent cell death of ventral midbrain neurons

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 48, 期 2, 页码 117-128

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.06.012

关键词

Histone deacetylase; Neuron; Midbrain; Mouse; Acetylation; Trichostatin A; Valproic acid; Sodium butyrate; Caspase; Cell death

资金

  1. Parkinson Society Canada
  2. NSERC
  3. Ontario Ministry of Research & Innovation (ERA)
  4. CFI/OIT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity results in dedifferentiation of various neural precursor cell populations, but is also known to promote neuronal differentiation. We sought to determine the effects of HDAC inhibition on differentiated and non-differentiated midbrain cells in order to examine more closely the consequences of HDAC inhibition on cell fate in a heterogeneous population. We demonstrate that HDAC inhibitor (HDACi) treatment causes a significant attenuation in the numbers of neurons, but not astrocytes, within 48 h, with no evidence of neuronal dedifferentiation. The loss of neurons is due to an initial morphological destabilization, which is not recoverable upon inhibitor removal, and ultimately leads to cell death. HDACi treatment results in progenitor cell cycle arrest and Caspase-dependent apoptosis. In contrast, the loss of midbrain neurons does not correlate with activated Caspase-3 expression. Treating cultures transiently with Caspase inhibitors blocks overall HDACi-induced cell death in the cultures, but does not prevent the loss of neurons. These data suggest that HDACi treated midbrain neurons undergo Caspase-independent cell death. Finally, we demonstrate that cortical neurons do not undergo cell death in response to HDACi treatment, suggesting that there may be tissue-specific or microenvironmental factors that promote the susceptibility of midbrain neurons to the neurotoxic effects of HDAC inhibition. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据