4.3 Article

Disorganized olfactory bulb lamination in mice deficient for transcription factor AP-2ε

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR NEUROSCIENCE
卷 42, 期 3, 页码 161-171

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcn.2009.06.010

关键词

AP-2 epsilon; Tcfap2e; Olfactory bulb; Cre recombinase; Mitral cell; Internal plexiform layer

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DE 12728, P30 DC006070]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Within the olfactory bulb, neurons and their axonal connections are organized into distinct layers corresponding to different functionalities. Here we demonstrate that transcription factor AP-2 epsilon is required for olfactory bulb development, specifically the establishment of appropriate neuronal lamination. During normal mouse embryogenesis, AP-2 epsilon transcripts are one of the earliest markers of olfactory bulb formation, and expression eventually becomes refined to the projection neurons, the mitral and tufted cells. To assess the function of AP-2 epsilon in olfaction, we generated a null allele (the AK allele) by inserting a Cre recombinase transgene into the endogenous AP-2 epsilon genomic locus. AP-2 epsilon-null mice exhibited defective olfactory bulb architecture. The mitral cell layer was disorganized, typified by misoriented and aberrantly positioned projection neurons, and the adjacent internal plexiform layer was absent. Despite the significant disruption of olfactory bulb organization, AP-2 epsilon null mice were viable and could discriminate a variety of odors. AP-2 epsilon-null mice thus provide compelling evidence for the robust nature of the mouse olfactory system, and serve as a model system to probe both the regulation of neuronal lamination and the functional circuitry of the olfactory bulb. We also show that Cre recombinase expression directed by the AP-2 epsilon locus can specifically target floxed genes within the olfactory bulb, extending the utility of this AK allele. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据