4.8 Article

Cells of a common developmental origin regulate REM/non-REM sleep and wakefulness in mice

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 350, 期 6263, 页码 957-961

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aad1023

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Science and Technology Agency PRESTO program
  2. Ministry of Education, Cutlure, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT) World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI)
  3. MEXT KAKENHI [23115724, 26115503]
  4. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [23700403, 21800090]
  5. Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research
  6. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  7. Sumitomo Foundation
  8. SENSHIN Medical Research Foundation
  9. Japan Foundation for Applied Enzymology (TMFC)
  10. RIKEN Special Postdoctoral Researcher Program
  11. Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program) - Council for Science and Technology Policy (CSTP)
  12. RIKEN intramural fund
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23700403, 21800090, 26115503] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian sleep comprises rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and non-REM (NREM) sleep. To functionally isolate from the complex mixture of neurons populating the brainstem pons those involved in switching between REM and NREM sleep, we chemogenetically manipulated neurons of a specific embryonic cell lineage in mice. We identified excitatory glutamatergic neurons that inhibit REM sleep and promote NREM sleep. These neurons shared a common developmental origin with neurons promoting wakefulness; both derived from a pool of proneural hindbrain cells expressing Atoh1 at embryonic day 10.5. We also identified inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid-releasing neurons that act downstream to inhibit REM sleep. Artificial reduction or prolongation of REM sleep in turn affected slow-wave activity during subsequent NREM sleep, implicating REM sleep in the regulation of NREM sleep.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据