4.5 Article

Dopamine receptor D2S gene transfer improves the sensitivity of GH3 rat pituitary adenoma cells to bromocriptine

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 382, 期 1, 页码 377-384

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.10.021

关键词

Pituitary adenoma; GH3 cell; Dopamine 2 receptor; Dopamine 2 receptor short isoform; Bromocriptine; Apoptosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30800347, 81201687, 81271523]
  2. Zhejiang Povincial Natural Science Foundation of China [R2091137, Y2110554]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health talents
  4. Science and Technology Bureau of Wenzhou City [H20070040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bromocriptine, a dopamine agonist (DA), has been used in the treatment of prolactinomas. Recent studies have indicated that dopamine 2 receptor short isoform (D2S) may play an important role in suppressing PRL synthesis and prolactinoma cell growth under DA treatment. In the current study, we investigated the role of D2S in the therapeutic action of bromocriptine in GH3 using both in vitro and in vivo approaches. Infection of adenovirus-D2S increased D2S expression in GH3 cells (P < 0.05). D2S expression significantly decreased the GH3 cell viability subjected to bromocriptine treatment in vitro (P < 0.05). In nude mice, adenovirus-D2S transfection sensitized GH3 xenograft to bromocriptine treatment evidenced by the significant inhibition of D2S expressed tumor growth as compared with vector control. Furthermore, decrease of Bcl-2 expression, increase of Bax, and active Caspase-3 were found in D2S expressed GH3 xenograft subjected to bromocriptine treatment. In summary, our study indicates that D2S expression plays a critical role in the therapeutic action of bromocriptine in pituitary adenomas and that adenovirus-mediated D2S gene transfer combined with bromocriptine may provide a novel treatment for DA-resistant prolactinomas. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据