4.5 Article

TCERG1 Regulates Alternative Splicing of the Bcl-x Gene by Modulating the Rate of RNA Polymerase II Transcription

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 751-762

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06255-11

关键词

-

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BFU2008-01599, BFU2009-08796]
  2. Fundacion para la Investigacion y Prevencion del SIDA en Espana [36768]
  3. Junta de Andalucia [2009/CVI-4626]
  4. Fonda Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER)
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  6. Spanish Ministry of Education
  7. CSIC
  8. FRSQ

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex functional coupling exists between transcriptional elongation and pre-mRNA alternative splicing. Pausing sites and changes in the rate of transcription by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) may therefore have fundamental impacts in the regulation of alternative splicing. Here, we show that the elongation and splicing-related factor TCERG1 regulates alternative splicing of the apoptosis gene Bcl-x in a promoter-dependent manner. TCERG1 promotes the splicing of the short isoform of Bcl-x (Bcl-x(s)) through the SB1 regulatory element located in the first half of exon 2. Consistent with these results, we show that TCERG1 associates with the Bcl-x pre-mRNA. A transcription profile analysis revealed that the RNA sequences required for the effect of TCERG1 on Bcl-x alternative splicing coincide with a putative polymerase pause site. Furthermore, TCERG1 modifies the impact of a slow polymerase on Bcl-x alternative splicing. In support of a role for an elongation mechanism in the transcriptional control of Bcl-x alternative splicing, we found that TCERG1 modifies the amount of pre-mRNAs generated at distal regions of the endogenous Bcl-x. Most importantly, TCERG1 affects the rate of RNAPII transcription of endogenous human Bcl-x. We propose that TCERG1 modulates the elongation rate of RNAPII to relieve pausing, thereby activating the proapoptotic Bcl-x(S) 5' splice site.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据