4.5 Article

Repression of IP-10 by Interactions between Histone Deacetylation and Hypermethylation in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 2874-2886

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01527-09

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0600890]
  2. Wellcome Trust [088751]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0600890] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [G0600890] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Targeted repression of a subset of key genes involved in tissue remodeling is a cardinal feature of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The mechanism is unclear but is potentially important in disease pathogenesis and therapeutic targeting. We have previously reported that defective histone acetylation is responsible for the repression of the antifibrotic cyclooxygenase-2 gene. Here we extended our study to the repression of another antifibrotic gene, the potent angiostatic chemokine gamma interferon (IFN-gamma)-inducible protein of 10 kDa (IP-10), in lung fibroblasts from patients with IPF. We revealed that this involved not only histone deacetylation, as with cyclooxygenase-2 repression, but also histone H3 hypermethylation, as a result of decreased recruitment of histone acetyltransferases and increased presence of histone deacetylase (HDAC)-containing repressor complexes, histone methyltransferases G9a and SUV39H1, and heterochromatin protein 1 at the IP-10 promoter, leading to reduced transcription factor binding. More importantly, treatment of diseased cells with HDAC or G9a inhibitors similarly reversed the repressive histone deacetylation and hypermethylation and restored IP-10 expression. These findings strongly suggest that epigenetic dysregulation involving interactions between histone deacetylation and hypermethylation is responsible for targeted repression of IP-10 and potentially other antifibrotic genes in fibrotic lung disease and that this is amenable to therapeutic targeting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据