4.6 Article

Gestational hypertension and the developmental origins of cardiac hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 391, 期 1-2, 页码 201-209

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-014-2003-9

关键词

Developmental origins of health and disease; Diastolic dysfunction; Gestational hypertension; Gene expression

资金

  1. Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario [NA-7297]
  2. Canadian Foundation of Innovation
  3. Garfield Kelly Cardiovascular Development Fund, Queen's University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The developmental origins of health and disease refer to the theory that adverse maternal environments influence fetal development and the risk of cardiovascular disease in adulthood. We used the chronically hypertensive atrial natriuretic peptide knockout (ANP-/-) mouse as a model of gestational hypertension, and attempted to determine the effect of gestational hypertension on left ventricular (LV) structure and function in adult offspring. We crossed normotensive ANP+/+ females with ANP-/- males (yielding ANP+/-(WT) offspring) and hypertensive ANP-/- females with ANP+/+ males (yielding ANP+/-(KO) offspring). Cardiac gene expression was measured using real-time quantitative PCR. Cardiac function was assessed using echocardiography. Daily injections of isoproterenol (ISO) were used to induce cardiac stress. Collagen deposition was assessed using picrosirius red staining. All mice were 10 weeks of age. Gestational hypertension resulted in significant LV hypertrophy in offspring, with no change in LV function. Treatment with ISO resulted in significant LV diastolic dysfunction with a restrictive filling pattern (increased E/A ratio and E/e') and interstitial myocardial fibrosis only in ANP+/-(KO) and not ANP+/-(WT) offspring. Gestational hypertension programs adverse LV structural and functional remodeling in offspring. These data suggest that adverse maternal environments may increase the risk of heart failure in offspring later in life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据