4.6 Article

The direct effect of estrogen on cell viability and apoptosis in human gastric cancer cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 395, 期 1-2, 页码 99-107

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11010-014-2115-2

关键词

Gender disparity; Estrogen; Estrogen receptor; Apoptosis; PEG10

资金

  1. Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation of China [2012FFB04316]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30801336, 81102863]
  3. Incubator Project of Renmin Hospital Wuhan University [2013RMFH008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidemiology researches indicated that gastric cancer is a male-predominant disease; both expression level of estrogen and expression pattern of estrogen receptors (ERs) influence its carcinogenesis. But the direct effect of estrogen on gastric cancer cells is still unclear. This study aimed to explore the direct effect of beta-estradiol (E2) on gastric cancer cells. SGC7901 and BGC823 were treated with a serial of concentrations of E2. The survival rates of both the cell lines were significantly reduced, and the reduction of viability was due to apoptosis triggered by E2 treatment. Caspase 3 was activated in response to the increasing E2 concentration in both SGC7901 and BGC823. Cleaved Caspase 3 fragments were detected, and the expression levels of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL were reduced. Apoptosis was further confirmed by flow cytometry. The expression level of PEG10, an androgen receptor target gene, was reduced during E2 treatment. Both ER alpha and ER beta were expressed in these cell lines, and the result of bioinformatics analysis of gastric cancer from GEO datasets indicated that the expression levels of both ER alpha and ER beta were significantly higher in noncancerous gastric tissues than in gastric cancer tissues. Our research indicated that estrogen can reduce cell viability and promote apoptosis in gastric cancer cells directly; ERs expression level is associated with gastric cancer. Our research will help to understand the mechanism of gender disparity in gastric cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据